GO.Ms.No:74, Dt:24-02-1994

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

ABSTRACT

Public Services - State and Subordinate Services - Promotion/Appointment to higher posts of Officers - Who are involved in Enquires - Further Orders - Issued.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (SER.C) DEPARTMENT

 
G.O.Ms. No. 74                                                                                                               Dated: 24-2-1994
          
        Read the following: -

1. G.O.Ms.No. 424. G.A. (Ser.C) Dept., dated 25-5-1976.

2. G.O.Ms.No.104. G.A. (Ser.C) Dept., dated 16-2-1990.

3. G.O.Ms.No. 66. G.A. (Ser.C) Dept., dated 30-1-1991.

@@@@@

ORDER

In the G.Os read above, instructions have been issued for consideration of the claims for promotion of Officers who are facing enquires in any departmental proceedings or before a criminal Court or whose conduct is under investigation and against whom Departmental Proceedings or criminal prosecution is about to be instituted.

 
2. During the meeting of Secretaries to Government held on 7-7-1992, the issue of inordinate delays in finalising enquiries both Departmental and Anti-Corruption Bureau resulting in hardship to the employees, was discussed and an Officers' Committee was constituted, to examine, among others, the issue of "Promotion of Officers" involved in Enquires and to submit proposal for review of the Existing instructions. The Committee has accordingly made certain recommendations which have been accepted by the Standing - Sub- Committee of Secretaries to Government in their meeting held on 6- 12-1993.
 
3. Keeping in view the said recommendations and the procedure and guidelines issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and pension, Government of India vide their Memorandum No. 22011/4/91, Estt.A, dated 14-9-1992. Government direct that the following procedure be followed for promotion of Officers against whom disciplinary cases are pending:
 
4. The appointing authorities concerned should specifically bring to the notice of Departmental Promotion Committee/Screening Committee the following categories of disciplinary cases

 i) Officers under suspension.

 

ii) Officers in respect of whom a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings an: pending.

 

iii) Officers in respect of whom prosecution for a criminal charge is pending.

 
5. The Departmental promotion Committee/Screening Committee shall assess the suitability or the Officers coming within the purview of the circumstances mentioned above, along with other eligible candidates following the procedure prescribed in G.O.Ms.No. 424, G.A. (Ser.C)Department, dated 25-5-1976.
 
6. In cases where the Officer’s promotion is differed in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 424, Genl. Admn. (Ser.C) Dept., dt.25-5-1976 and the proceedings have not been disposed, of, such cases should be reviewed by the Departmental Promotion Committee in its next meeting to ascertain the progress made in the Disciplinary proceedings/Criminal Prosecution and further measures taken to expedite completion.
 
7. There may be some cases, where the disciplinary case/criminal prosecution against the Officers is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first Departmental Promotion Committee. In such a situation, the appointing authority may review the case or the Officers, provided they are not under suspension, to consider' the desirability of giving the adhoc promotion, keeping in view the following aspects:

a) Whether the promotion of the Officer will be against public interest.

 

b) Whether the charges are grave enough, to warrant continued denial of promotion.

 

c) Whether there is any likelihood of the case corning to a conclusion in the near future.

 

d) Whether the delay in the finalisation of proceedings, departmental or in a Court of Law, in not directly or indirectly attributable to the Officer concerned.

 

e) Whether there is any likelihood of misuse of Official position which the Officer may occupy after adhoc promotion, which may adversely affect the conduct of the departmental case/criminal prosecution.

 
8. If the disciplinary proceedings arose out of the investigations conducted by the Anti-Corruption Bureau the Anti-Corruption Bureau should also be consulted and its views should be taken into account.
 
9. In case the appointing authority consider that ii would not be against the public, interest to allow adhoc promotion to the Officer concerned, his case should be placed before the next Departmental Promotion Committee held in the normal course to decide whether the officer is suitable for promotion on adhoc basis. Where the Officer is considered for adhoc promotion, the Departmental Promotion Committee should make its assessment on the basis of the totality of the individual's record of service without taking into account the pending disciplinary case/criminal prosecution against him/her.
 
10. If a decision is taken to promote an Officer on an adhoc basis. an order of promotion may he issued making it clear in the order itself that
 

i) the promotion is being made on purely adhoc basis and the adhoc promotion will not confer any right for regular promotion: and

 

ii) the promotion shall be until further orders. It should also be indicated in the orders that the Government reserve the right to cancel the adhoc promotion and revert at any time the Officer to the post from which he was promoted.

 
11. If the Officer concerned is acquitted in the criminal prosecution on the merits of the case or is fully exonerated in the departmental proceedings, the adhoc promotion already made may be confirmed and the promotion treated as a regular one from the date of the adhoc promotion with all attendant benefits. In case the Officer could have normally got his regular promotion from a dare prior to the date of his adhoc promotion with reference to his placement in the Departmental Promotion Committee proceedings and the actual date of promotion of the person ranked immediately junior to him by the same Departmental Promotion Committee, he would also be allowed his due seniority and benefit or notional promotion.
 
12. If the Officer is not acquitted on merits in the criminal prosecution but purely on technical grounds and Government either proposes to take up the matter to a higher Court or to proceed against him departmentally or if the officer is not exonerated in the departmental proceedings, the adhoc promotion granted to him should be brought to an end.
 
13. The orders issued in the G.Os. read above shall be deemed to have been modified to the extent necessary as per these orders.
 
14. All Department; of Secretariat/Heads of Departments are requested to follow the above procedure scrupulously and bring to the notice of all concerned.
 
(By order and in the Name of the Governor of Andhra Pradesh)

 K. JAYABHARATH R EDDY

Chief Secretary of Govt

OPEN - DPC Rules - References (open) 


OPEN - State and Subordinate Service Rules - References (open)


Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.