Memo.No:9101, Dt:25-12-1991 | Unauthorized absence | Wilful and Prolonged absence

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FINANCE & PLANNING (F.W. - F.R.-1) DEPARTMENT
 
Cir.Memo No.C-9101-4/8/FR.I/91                                                               Dated. 25-12-91

 

Sub: Unauthorised absence - Wilful and prolonged absence from duty without proper leave - Further instructions - Issued.
- - -
 
In Circular Memo No.4481/A/128/FR.l/88, Fin. &.Pig. (Fin. Wing. FRI) Dept. dated 7-7-1988 Government have issued instructions ordering concerned departmental authorities to initiate disciplinary action against those employees who remained absent from duty without proper leave and pass appropriate orders on the basis or the disciplinary proceedings by following the procedure laid down in A.P.C.S. (C.C.A) Rules, 1963 read with instructions in Appendix-VI to the said rules. In-spite of those instructions number of cases are being referred to Finance Department for clarification on some of the following questions:
 

(i) Whether a member of service who remained absent from duty without proper leave can be permitted to join duty if he gives joining report pending further action to determine or regulate the period of absence by taking disciplinary action or otherwise:

 

(ii) Whether the resignation tendered or request for voluntary retirement made by a member of service who has remained absent without proper leave can be accepted without determination of the period of unauthorised absence.

 

In view of this a need is felt for issuing further instructions in the matter as guidelines in continuation of the instructions issued in the Circular Memo afore mentioned.
 
2. According to FR. 18, and rule 5-A of the A.P. Leave Rules, 1933 and the Note-I thereunder, no Government servant should be granted leave of any kind for a period exceeding live years and that wilful absence from duty not covered by grant of any leave shall be treated as 'dies-non- for all purposes viz. increments, leave and pension.
 
3. Neither FR. 18 nor Rule 5 of the A.P. Leave Rules, can be construed to mean:
 
(a) that the member of service who remains absent from duty without proper leave cannot be permitted to join duty if he gives a joining report; or


(b) that such member of service ceases to be in service by such absence so as to discharge him from service in terms of FR. 18.
 
What therefore follows from this is that if a member of service who remains absent without any leave gives a joining report it should be ensured by the competent authority that he is permitted to join immediately pending initiation of the disciplinary action for unauthorised absence, in case such action has already not been initiated against him and in all such cases the period of unauthorised absence has to be treated as ‘dies-non’ in accordance with the Notes-1 under F.R.18 and Rule 5-A aforesaid. This treatment of unauthorised absence as 'dies non’ is distinct from disciplinary action taken or to be 'taken against the employees concerned.

4. Action against regular employees:
 
What F.R.8 and Rule 5 of the A.P. Leave Rules mandates is that no member of service shall he granted leave of any kind for a continuous period exceeding five years without the specific approval or Govt. No inference can be drawn from these rules that disciplinary action against a member of service cannot be taken unless he is continuously absent for more than five years without any leave. It is therefore clarified that it is not at all necessary for the authority competent to initiate disciplinary action to wait for a period of five years to initiate disciplinary action against the member of service for his absence from duty wilfully or unauthorisedly. In all such cases the disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against such member or service who remained absent without any leave straight away by following the procedure laid down in Rule 19 (2) of the A.P.C.S. (C.C.A) Rules. 1963 read with instructions 5 (c) (iv) of instructions in Appendix-VI to the said rules for unauthorised absence without leave which constitutes good and sufficient reason for initiating disciplinary action under the said rules and such other misconduct as having secured gainful employment elsewhere during his absence from duty without leave. In all such cases the enquiry officer has to be decided to complete the enquiry within a fixed time say within a period of 1-2 months. The charges framed against the employee concerned should be communicated by Registered Post Acknowledgement due. If however the employee is not available at the last address given by him the Charge Memo should be got published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette and enquiry should be conducted exparte for taking necessary action against him. Even in such cases where an employee reports hack to duty he should be permitted to join duty without prejudice to the action contemplated or pending against him. If the employee applies for leave on medical grounds along with the joining report and extends leave on the same grounds beyond three months, he should be referred to Medical Board for examination and necessary action may be taken against him on the basis of the medical report.
 
5. Temporary Employees:
 
According to the note under Rule 6-A of A.P. Leave Rules, read with proviso to FR. 73, a temporary Government servant working under emergency provisions who remains absent from duty after applying for leave or extension of leave to which he is not entitled to under the Rules shall be deemed to have been discharged from duty with effect from the date from which he is not entitled to any leave unless the leave applied for is granted in relaxation of relevant rules. Where such a temporary employee, absents himself unauthorisedly or without sufficient justification. Action should be taken immediately for discharging him from service invoking this rule, by issuing an innocuous order indicating the provisions, under which the employee stands discharged.
 
6. Request for "Resignation" while absent unauthorisedly:
 
Resignation by a member or a service is governed by general Rule 39. General Rule 39 which is, relevant for the purpose reads as follows:
"39. Resignation"

(a) A member of a service may resign his appointment and the acceptance or his resignation by the appointing authority shall take effect:

 

(i) in case he is on duty, from the date on which he is relieved or his duties in pursuance or such acceptance:

 

(ii) in case he is on leave, from the date of communication of such acceptance lo the member or if the said authority so directs from the date or expiry of leave; and

 

(iii) in any other case, from the date of communication of such acceptance to the member of from such other date, not being earlier than the date on which he was last on duty, as the said authority may, having regard to administrative exigencies. Specify:

 

Provided that a resignation of a member of a service, who is placed under suspension from service pending investigation or enquiry into grave charges or who is deemed to have been suspended under rule 13 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules. 1963, shall not be accepted during the period of such suspension: and

 

Provided further that no withdrawal of resignation shall be permitted except with the sanction of the Government after the date of its actual acceptance by the appointing authority.

 
(b) A member of a service shall, if he resigns his appointment, forfeit not only the service rendered by him in the particular post held by him at the time of resignation but all his previous service under the Government."
 
The consequence of the resignation as laid down in General Rule 39(b) is that not only the service rendered by the member of service in a particular post held by him at the time of resignation but also all his previous service under the Government will stand forfeited. In view of this consequence the regulation of the period of unauthorised absence would be of no consequence an9 the. acceptance of such resignation tendered by the member of service who remained absent from duty without leave need not wait the determination of unauthorised absence.

Request for "Voluntary Retirement" while absent unauthorisedly:

         Instances have also come to notice where Government servants, while being unauthorisedly absent or where their leave was refused, have sought for voluntary retirement on completion of 20/33 years of qualifying service in accordance with Rules 41 and 44 of Revised Pension Rules, 1980, respectively, the competent authorities concerned have failed to take action to accept them promptly, resulting in unintended benefit lo the employees concerned. In case of retirement on completion of 20 years or qualifying service as provided under Rule 43 of Revised Pension Rules, 1980, a Government servant who gives a notice in writing of his intention to retire voluntarily shall not retire unless the notice given by him is accepted by the competent authority, provided that the competent authority shall issue an order before the expiry of the notice period accepting or rejecting the notice. In case of voluntary retirement on completion of 33 years of qualifying service as provided under Rule 44 of Revised Pension Rules, 1980, the appointing authority has lo issue orders permitting the Government servant to retire from service. In normal course, in either case, the voluntary retirement can be accepted / permitted as the case may he. pending determination of the period of unauthorised absence. In cases where it is contemplated to take disciplinary action against the employee concerned, it would be appropriate to frame a charge against him before he retires from service so that further action may be pursued in accordance with Rule 9 of Revised Pension Rules unless the charges are grave and acceptance of such notice would not be in public interest. As such, acceptance of notice of voluntary retirement need not await the determination of the period of absence, provided the Government servant concerned has rendered 20/33 years of qualifying service.
 
Even in cases where an employee is permitted to retire voluntarily, departmental proceedings can be instituted with the sanction of Government in respect of a cause of action which arose or an event which took place not more than four years before such institution, in terms of Rule 9 of Revised Pension Rules.
 
The Departments of Secretariat and all the Heads of Departments are therefore, requested to keep these guidelines in view while dealing with cases of unauthorised absence, and to communicate them for implementation by their Subordinate Officers who may be appointing authorities of posts. the holders of which may attract the provisions of rules referred to in these guidelines. 
S. SANTHANAM
Special Chief Secretary to Government


Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.